Quantcast

Equinox vs Felix startup time

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Equinox vs Felix startup time

Romain Gilles
is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix
startup time?
Does it due to a different approach of class loading?

There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix
during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox?

Thanks in advance,

Romain
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

jbonofre
Hi Romain,

you mean that one is longer than the other ?
on which version ?

I didn't notice that.

Regards
JB

On 04/05/2012 02:40 PM, Romain Gilles wrote:

> is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix
> startup time?
> Does it due to a different approach of class loading?
>
> There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix
> during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Romain
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

Romain Gilles
Ok,
Do you have an advice about one vs the other.
I have realized some bench on the registry and equinox 3.7.1 seems to
perform better than Felix 4.0.1.
Is there any other rooms for investigation? Class loading ...

Romain.

Le jeudi 5 avril 2012, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :

> Hi Romain,
>
> you mean that one is longer than the other ?
> on which version ?
>
> I didn't notice that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/05/2012 02:40 PM, Romain Gilles wrote:
>
>> is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and
>> Felix
>> startup time?
>> Does it due to a different approach of class loading?
>>
>> There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix
>> during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Romain
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

Guillaume Nodet
A few weeks ago, I spent some time trying to tune up a bit the startup time
of karaf and made a few modifications to private copies of felix framework,
file install and karaf.  I'll try to bring them backs that they can be part
of the next releases, but those are not major modifications, so nothing
really magic to expect.

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:10, Romain Gilles <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Ok,
> Do you have an advice about one vs the other.
> I have realized some bench on the registry and equinox 3.7.1 seems to
> perform better than Felix 4.0.1.
> Is there any other rooms for investigation? Class loading ...
>
> Romain.
>
> Le jeudi 5 avril 2012, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
>
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > you mean that one is longer than the other ?
> > on which version ?
> >
> > I didn't notice that.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 04/05/2012 02:40 PM, Romain Gilles wrote:
> >
> >> is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and
> >> Felix
> >> startup time?
> >> Does it due to a different approach of class loading?
> >>
> >> There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix
> >> during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >> Romain
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > [hidden email]
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>



--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Loading...