Quantcast

Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

jbonofre
Hi all,

I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.

I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch
only once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?

Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

Guillaume Nodet
I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3,
integration with the new smx specs etc...  I don't have any problem waiting
more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold
back things that some people actually need.
I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't
have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I
really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it.

Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem,
but I don't really think this is the real problem.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.
>
> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only
> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

jbonofre
In reply to this post by jbonofre
It's good for me.

Regards
JB

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com

----- Reply message -----
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Subject: Karaf 2.3.x branch ?
Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 10:18 am


I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3,
integration with the new smx specs etc...  I don't have any problem waiting
more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold
back things that some people actually need.
I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't
have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I
really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it.

Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem,
but I don't really think this is the real problem.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.
>
> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only
> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



--
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

Achim Nierbeck
In reply to this post by Guillaume Nodet
I'm fine with a 2.3.0 branch also,

this way we can upgrade this branch to pax-web 1.1.2 which already
contains lots of improvements.

regards, Achim




Am 06.04.2012 10:18, schrieb Guillaume Nodet:

> I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
> it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3,
> integration with the new smx specs etc...  I don't have any problem waiting
> more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold
> back things that some people actually need.
> I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't
> have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I
> really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it.
>
> Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem,
> but I don't really think this is the real problem.
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.
>>
>> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only
>> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
>> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> [hidden email]
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>


--
- Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/>  Committer&  PMC
- OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>    Committer&  Project Lead
- Blog<http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf 2.3.x branch ?

Andreas Pieber
Also +1 since it will allow us, as preached all the time :-), to better
separate features and improvement releases from bug fix releases!

Kind regards,
Andreas
On Apr 6, 2012 2:00 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm fine with a 2.3.0 branch also,
>
> this way we can upgrade this branch to pax-web 1.1.2 which already
> contains lots of improvements.
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
>
>
> Am 06.04.2012 10:18, schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
>
>> I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
>> it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3,
>> integration with the new smx specs etc...  I don't have any problem
>> waiting
>> more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold
>> back things that some people actually need.
>> I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't
>> have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I
>> really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it.
>>
>> Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem,
>> but I don't really think this is the real problem.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>>
>>> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch.
>>>
>>> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only
>>> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out.
>>> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> - Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/**>  Committer&  PMC
> - OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>>
>    Committer&  Project Lead
> - Blog<http://notizblog.**nierbeck.de/ <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>>
>
>
Loading...