|
Hi all,
I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch. I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only once Karaf 3.0.0 is out. Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [hidden email] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com |
|
I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but
it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3, integration with the new smx specs etc... I don't have any problem waiting more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold back things that some people actually need. I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it. Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem, but I don't really think this is the real problem. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch. > > I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only > once Karaf 3.0.0 is out. > Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ? > > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [hidden email] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com |
|
In reply to this post by jbonofre
It's good for me.
Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [hidden email] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://wwx.talend.com ----- Reply message ----- From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Subject: Karaf 2.3.x branch ? Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 10:18 am I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3, integration with the new smx specs etc... I don't have any problem waiting more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold back things that some people actually need. I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it. Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem, but I don't really think this is the real problem. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch. > > I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only > once Karaf 3.0.0 is out. > Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ? > > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [hidden email] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com |
|
In reply to this post by Guillaume Nodet
I'm fine with a 2.3.0 branch also,
this way we can upgrade this branch to pax-web 1.1.2 which already contains lots of improvements. regards, Achim Am 06.04.2012 10:18, schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but > it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3, > integration with the new smx specs etc... I don't have any problem waiting > more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold > back things that some people actually need. > I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't > have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I > really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it. > > Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem, > but I don't really think this is the real problem. > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch. >> >> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only >> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out. >> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [hidden email] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > -- - Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer& PMC - OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer& Project Lead - Blog<http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> |
|
Also +1 since it will allow us, as preached all the time :-), to better
separate features and improvement releases from bug fix releases! Kind regards, Andreas On Apr 6, 2012 2:00 PM, "Achim Nierbeck" <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm fine with a 2.3.0 branch also, > > this way we can upgrade this branch to pax-web 1.1.2 which already > contains lots of improvements. > > regards, Achim > > > > > Am 06.04.2012 10:18, schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > >> I do work on a daily basis on a private branch based on karaf 2.2.x, but >> it's a bit more than that, it contains a few things like osgi 4.3, >> integration with the new smx specs etc... I don't have any problem >> waiting >> more, but I'm felling that's a disservice to the community because I hold >> back things that some people actually need. >> I know the argument for rushing 3.0 out and focusing on it, but I don't >> have much time to do that myself and more importantly, that's not what I >> really need, so I don't think I can devote much time on it. >> >> Anyway, if people want me to delete that branch, I don't have any problem, >> but I don't really think this is the real problem. >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[hidden email]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> I saw that Guillaume started to create the Karaf 2.3.x branch. >>> >>> I'm not against but AFAIR, we discussed to create Karaf 2.3.x branch only >>> once Karaf 3.0.0 is out. >>> Maybe I missed a discussion thread on the mailing list ? >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [hidden email] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > - Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/**> Committer& PMC > - OPS4J Pax Web<http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>> > Committer& Project Lead > - Blog<http://notizblog.**nierbeck.de/ <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>> > > |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
