Quantcast

Karaf and SFTP / SCP

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Karaf and SFTP / SCP

Guillaume Nodet
Given we have the SSHD server running in Karaf, I wonder if we should
provide an easy way to enable SFTP or SCP.
I think people may be interested in it for remote deployment.
I'm not sure we should enable that by default, but at least something
in the doc or a how-to might be useful.

Thoughts ?

--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf and SFTP / SCP

jbonofre
Hi Guillaume,

it can be an interesting optional feature indeed.

It can allows people to remotely update the etc or deploy folder.

Regards
JB

On 11/26/2010 09:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Given we have the SSHD server running in Karaf, I wonder if we should
> provide an easy way to enable SFTP or SCP.
> I think people may be interested in it for remote deployment.
> I'm not sure we should enable that by default, but at least something
> in the doc or a how-to might be useful.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Karaf and SFTP / SCP

jgoodyear
This does sound interesting.

My first thought is for using it to remotely connect to instances and
perform back ups of configurations, bundles.. or perhaps soft clone
the instance via copying etc & deploy folder.

J

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi Guillaume,
>
> it can be an interesting optional feature indeed.
>
> It can allows people to remotely update the etc or deploy folder.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/26/2010 09:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Given we have the SSHD server running in Karaf, I wonder if we should
>> provide an easy way to enable SFTP or SCP.
>> I think people may be interested in it for remote deployment.
>> I'm not sure we should enable that by default, but at least something
>> in the doc or a how-to might be useful.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>
Loading...